Discussion about this post

User's avatar
p_a_r_t_b's avatar

As a youth in the 1970s, long before the term PAWG, I observed that some of the black girls, more often than the white girls, had really round rumps. I remember mentioning to some teenaged buddy back then what I called "the black girl ass." Nonetheless, I have always preferred sexual partners with white skin.

It seems incredible that one can be called a racist for having preferences for a sex partner with a particular color of flesh or a particular body construction. Even if I believed in "cultural appropriation," how may a woman appropriate a rear end as though it were a food recipe from a Caribbean island? Given the hundreds or thousands of genetic and environmental factors that go into sexual selection, how can having a preference for the skin tone of a partner be a clear sign of "racism?" If anything, the observation that a "white girl" has a "phat ass" like that of a black girl should seem more objectionable as fetishizing the female buttocks and conceptualizing the female form as a Frankenstein's Monster of interchangeable bits than for the supposedly discriminatory statement the statement makes that phat ass becomes "more valuable" when hitched onto to a white girl.

If a sexual preference for skin color is racist, the next step is a government program to teach us what we should like in sexual partners and the step following that is for the government simply to assign us sexual partners (or pornography) without regard to our desires.

I will continue to enjoy the sight of the round asses I like to view on girls of the skin color I find pleasing, secure in the knowledge that others have the same right and privilege to enjoy what they find pleases the eye in sexual matters.

Expand full comment
Shila B's avatar

Maybe write one on Olympics and the PAWG discourse

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts